It is believed that when children as young as years of age commit a crime, they do not necessarily grow up to become criminals; yet when they are punished in the same manner as adults, the odds of this could somehow change. In the last decade, virtually every state has made it much easier to try juveniles as adults.
Pros The reason why this theory has come into the picture is that a crime is a crime, no matter at what age it is committed. Email At the age of 16, Cameron Williams lives a life far removed from the world of other teenagers. Criminal Records Follow Crimes that are on your juvenile records hold much less weight in the world than those on your adult record.
This is the exact attitude which leads to the question of whether the whole juvenile system should be discarded to include only the one judicial system of criminal courts, which tries both children and adults under the same law, with the same rules.
The separate juvenile system was developed both to mitigate these harms and because youth were being preyed upon and "schooled in crime" while in adult prisons.
The trouble is that the valve has both expanded and lost its spring. Funneling more youth into the adult system does no good and much harm.
So the children who fall in the higher end of this range, should be punished in the same way as that of adults, it is argued.
Juveniles are not allowed to drink, drive, get married, and if they sign legal contracts, their signatures are invalid.
To begin, adult incarcerations do more harm than good.
This is a very high number because teenagers have full control over their thoughts and actions. There are several reasons for why this happens. Should Juveniles be Tried as Adults? Since juvenile offenders are more likely to reoffend, the longer sentences are imperative.
They are the most vulnerable in the prison and face higher risks of violence and sexual assault. Wednesday, year-old Nathaniel Brazill was found guilty of second-degree murder for killing his English teacher last year.
It is also argued that since we take the age factor into consideration when it comes to important issues like marriage, social benefits, voting, and jobs, then why is it OK to execute harsh forms of punishments on them in the same way as that done for adults?
These diversion programs are specifically structured in order to redirect youthful offenders through programming. We are now sending them straight back to that harsh schoolyard.
In a civilized country, such as the United States, we should not allow juveniles to be tried as adults. This is damaging for all of society and especially for the young person and their family.
Defense attorneys might offer a different argument: By allowing them to be tried as adults, you give them the ability to have a trial by jury.
Without these two physical characteristics that separate the men from the boys, teenagers can not possibly be expected to endure the same consequence as fully matured adults.
No matter who commits it. But when we punish them as adults, we change those odds. So we change the rules of the game. And I see as a result of that, more prosecutors and the citizens generally seem to be exerting more pressure to charge these youths as adults, as opposed to having them processed through the juvenile justice system," she said.
Our justice system depends upon holding perpetrators responsible for their actions. This is why we historically have built in a small "safety valve," under which transfer arguably is appropriate for those very few offenders who are extremely close to the age cutoff and commit particularly awful crimes.
The retribution and restitution is more appropriate in adult court. Indeed, people now act as if the decision to treat a juvenile as a juvenile implies a judgment that the crime was not that serious, the victims not that worthy of respect. Kids today are more sophisticated at a younger age; they understand the implications of violence and how to use violent weapons.
The trend began in the s, when virtually every state expanded the rules under which juvenile offenders could be charged as adults.
Teens tried as adults commit more crimes when released; their educational and employment prospects are markedly worse, creating opportunity and incentive for more crime; they bear a lifelong, potentially debilitating stigma.
Brings Justice For Extreme Crimes While juveniles may be kids, they should have the ability to distinguish right from wrong, especially in extreme circumstances.or when—juveniles should be tried as adults has been the subject of much debate.
Dialogue on Youth and Justice | 9. TRYING JUVENILE OFFENDERS AS ADULTS Juvenile court judges have always had authority to “waive asked whether execution of juveniles between the ages of. Across the United States, hundreds of young juvenile criminals are facing life in prison as the debate over whether juveniles should be tried as adults rages on.
The juvenile courts do not have a jury, and offenders are not given a proper trial. Instead the judge makes all of the decisions, often with the help of a team of mediators for the children and their families.
By allowing them to be tried as adults, you give them the ability to have a trial by jury. Cons of Juveniles Being Tried As Adults. 1. However, all juveniles sentenced to incarceration received nearly identical sentence length, regardless of whether they were tried in the criminal or the juvenile system.
To date, only two studies have examined whether stricter transfer laws result in lowered juvenile crime rates. Should Juveniles Be Tried As Adults Whether to try juveniles as adults or as minors has elicited heightened controversy.
The statistics today shows that individuals who commit criminal offenses have not gripped the notion that crime does not pay particularly among minors. Should Juveniles Be Tried As Adults (Persuasive Essay Sample). Today’s discussion will focus on whether or not juveniles should be allowed to be tried as adults.
In a civilized country, such as the United States, we should not allow juveniles to be tried as adults. To begin, adult incarcerations do more harm than good. Juveniles lack the mental capacity to fully understand their crime and punishment.Download